|
During the Order of Business in the Seanad, I said: We had a very good debate on Northern Ireland last night. It was interesting that there were representatives of the SDLP in the Houses yesterday. They were not here for the debate because it was delayed because of some kerfuffle in the other House at the time. Part of our objective is to have unity of mind between the two sides in Northern Ireland...
I watched two rugby matches in recent weeks. One took place in Dublin and there were two anthems for our team, one of which was “Amhrán na bhFiann”. Certainly, those from south of the Border seemed to join in that song with vigour. Those who came from the North did not seem to know the words. The second anthem, if that is the word to use, “Ireland’s call”, was clearly supported by both sides. I wonder is it again time for us at this stage to consider whether we should have a national anthem which would incorporate North and South and which would be representative of both sides. As we stated some years ago, the national anthem is not the only one that has a viewpoint, but “A Soldier’s Song”, or the national anthem of the French or the national anthem of the British, is very bloodthirsty as well. I mention it because it is worthwhile for us to look again, not just at the national anthem but at matters at which we do not look too often to see how can we manage now that we have got peace in Northern Ireland and now that we have two sides working together in Northern Ireland. With the changes that will take place in April, we have an opportunity to incorporate a full Ireland in many other ways, not just in that area.Another point was introduced by Senator Daly today. Rather similar words to the rugby song were used yesterday by President McAleese or, at least, her husband, Mr. Martin McAleese, “Your Country, Your Call”. It seems here is an opportunity for us in Ireland to recognise that if we are going to succeed, let us get behind it. A number of people have put up sufficient funds to encourage this. Instead of relying solely on foreign direct investment, it is an opportunity for us to do something ourselves. I recommend consideration of that because it is really worthwhile. |